Skip to content

menu

Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C. logo
HomeAboutContact
Rothwell Figg's

PTAB Law Blog

PTAB DecisionsAppellate DecisionsAbout the PTAB

Rule 36

Subscribe to Rule 36 via RSS

Federal Circuit’s Rule 36 Judgments Leave Everyone in the Dark

By Bryan Thompson on May 2, 2023
Posted in Appellate Decisions

Federal Circuit Rule 36 has been criticized for leaving IP practitioners in the dark as it allows for the court to enter judgment of affirmance without the reasoned analysis of the Court. Generally, the Rule allows for a judgement of affirmance without opinion if one of the enumerated conditions is met and the opinion would…

Blog Editors

Photo of Martin M. ZoltickMartin M. ZoltickMember
Photo of Joseph A. HyndsJoseph A. HyndsMember
Photo of Jenny L. ColgateJenny L. ColgateMember
Photo of Michael H. JonesMichael H. JonesMember
Photo of Brett A. PostalBrett A. PostalMember

About this Blog

Authored and edited by attorneys in Rothwell Figg’s Post-Grant Trial Group, Rothwell Figg’s PTAB Law Blog provides updates, articles, and analyses regarding the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), the intersection of district court litigation and PTAB practice, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and the America Invents Act (AIA) and patentability of inventions generally.

Read More....

Stay Connected

RSS LinkedIn Twitter Facebook
Subscribe to this blog

Topics

Archives

Blog Authors Show/Hide

  • Michael V. Battaglia
  • Jenny L. Colgate
  • Nicole M. DeAbrantes
  • Aydin H. Harston
  • Michael H. Jones
  • Kristen Logan
  • Jennifer B. Maisel
  • Jennifer P. Nock
  • James Pawlowski
  • Brett A. Postal
  • Mark T. Rawls
  • Michael Saunders
  • Dan Shores
  • Andrew J. Storaska
  • Bryan Thompson
  • Stephanie Waltersdorff
  • Sheena Wang
  • Martin M. Zoltick

Recent Posts

  • Trial Statistics Trends at the PTAB: 2025 Edition
  • “At Your Discretion” — Discretionary Denials Increase as PTAB Issues Institution Decisions
  • July USPTO Guidance Sets Stricter Standards for Evidence in IPR Petitions
  • The USPTO Provides Further Guidance on Discretionary Denials Policy
  • Understanding the PTAB’s Recent Informative Decision: Cambridge Mobile Telematics, Inc. v. Sfara, Inc.

Rothwell Figg Blogs

  • Biosimilars Law Bulletin
  • Privacy Zone
  • RF EMerge
Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
Washington, DC
901 New York Avenue, NW
Suite 900 East
Washington, DC 20001
202.783.6040
PTABeditors@rothwellfigg.com
Boston
10 Derne Street
Suite 302
Boston, MA 02114
617.312.3101
PTABeditors@rothwellfigg.com
RSS LinkedIn Twitter Facebook
Privacy PolicyDisclaimer

About Our Firm

To learn more about our firm and other practice areas, visit www.rothwellfigg.com.

Copyright © 2026, Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo